Look BitcoinGirl. I have seen you in various threads and you always seem reasonable. Please try to be neutral and you will get me.
Your behavior has become too rude in the last couple of weeks.
He has all his rights to act how he likes.
So do I or is there a double standard for some specific people?
My point was you were offending him with that topic where you had no business at all. Whatever emotion he had, that were towards other members. Right to act does not mean you start offending random person.
Is it forbidden to talk about other people's business? Do you always talk about your own thing only? Don't you interrupt whenever you see something is not right in your opinion? The thread wasn't created without making a reply in cryptofrka's thread. At first, I responded to him in Cryptofrka's thread and then Cryptofrka asked me and others not to write off-topic things. So, to be ON topic, I need a thread. Right? Please point me where do you see the wrong action.
I don't think you needed a topic for that. The users you wanted to protect have years of reputation on the forum. They know very well how to deal with any situation.
I have cleared my position a couple of times and here I am doing it again. The topic was created because Cryptofrka
asked not to write these things in his Merit source application thread for obvious reasons.
It was not supposed to be your problem but Cryptofrka's. If that thread was created by Cryptofrka then it was understandable.
Please try to understand. It was Cryptofrka's merit application thread where BenCodie wrote his post and then I and other members also responded. BenCodie replied back with some bad attitude and I wanted to write him back. Meanwhile, Cryptofrka asked not to post off-topic there. So what is wrong here?
Impress Rikafip? Why pick him only?
Because he reacted to your topic and expressed his thoughts.
I did not ask Rikafip to respond there.
Let's say I was defending some other forum members in a random thread and I never had interaction with them personally. If they respond, is it my problem? Do I have any influence to make them write their thoughts?
There are no point to keep arguing and repeat the same. I question, you explain; you question, I reply. It's an endless loop. So, I ignore all above and we move on.
Please do not tie me with JollyGood. I never had interaction with him.
Now it seems
you are interacting [at-least JollyGood is trying]. Are you becoming his friends? LOL
To be honest BitcoinGirl, I am annoyed now.
Where do you see I am interacting with him? If he is trying, that's from himself. He just shared his belief about my actions and that's it. You are supporting BenCodie without even considering the point I wrote. Can I say you are trying to be friends with BenCodie? Just agree and disagree makes friends and enemies here? I must be tooooo new here.
The "you" is a plural which is addressing you [Shishir99] and JollyGood but I was giving importance to JollyGood when I wrote "[at-least...]".
In that drama it seemed you and JollyGood was trying to be the baby babysitter for members like Rikafip and some others. People does not like at, it sense like you were trying to impress them.
I don't know about the others, but I really didn't get the impression that he (or Jollygood) were trying to imporess me or anyone else.
I was referring to
this reply from you.