How do you respond to the allegations that, quite clearly, zkSNACKs is in one way or another funding and cooperating with blockchain analysis company/companies? This is what you seem to be avoiding while addressing other questions.
zkSNACKs queries a data aggregation company to attempt to avoid accepting stolen funds for their coinjoin service. I don't know how effective or ineffective this precaution is in regards to false positives or false negatives.
By the way, I wonder how will you deal with this problem, keep in mind that this is only example and far from reality:
Let's say I am a thief/hacker who stole lots of bitcoins. I know honest users who value their privacy and use Wasabi wallet. Now, let's say Wasabi's BA partner tagged my wallet and now I want to ruin the party for everyone. I send coins from my stolen wallet to honest people who just use Wasabi for privacy purposes. Keep in mind that bitcoin blockchain is public. Your BA partner will automatically blacklist that wallet that received stolen funds, right? But truth is, that user has nothing to do with me, I just ruined his wallet's reputation because I intentionally sent him funds from my blacklisted wallet. How do you plan to deal with cases like this?
Just wondering, why doesn't your BA partner releases list of bitcoin addresses that are blacklisted? Why is that a secret?