And who's saying that Mixin wasn't trustworthy? I'm not defending, but as far as we know, they got hacked
The fact that they kept $200 million of
other people's money in a hot wallet is what makes them not trustworthy. If a bank loses their customers' money, I don't trust them. The same goes for any other company.
Of course, they are not trustworthy now! I was talking about the time when forum members were doing those reviews. At that point, there was no way for people to predict this or uncover security flaws from their end.
My point: it was a custodial service, and custodial services get hacked all the time. Losing your funds is undeniably terrible, and I sympathize with those who are affected. However, some of the responsibility also rests with the users themselves. Why do we keep repeating "not your keys..." here?