Even though those 100 users who review their service did not continue to use it afterwards but everyone of them (expect a few) review their service top notch and excellent

If the Mixin Safe Service was not trustable, had flaws then why people did not highlight in the review ? I must say it is a wrong behavior for most of the reviewers to review "Good" only (Maybe they got the money from the company so its hard to say bad words about them)
Personally, I was not enthusiastic about the idea, and I saw that the system was complex and difficult to understand for the average user, let alone a beginner, but I was really surprised that there were 100 members who had conducted reviews for this service. Personally, I did not read any of them, and I do not know how they were able to understand these complexities.
But after 100 members participated in that review campaign, I began to believe that it was a good service and that the problem was me.
Personally, I do not like miniscript, and with the limited number of wallets that support this technology, recent ledger miniscript vulnerability[1], Ledger Recovery[2], and their price policies[3], I expect that the number of users for this service will be very few and limited, and thus achieving a return from it will be difficult. .....
I honestly don't know but I think it is hard to find 100 BTT account can join to the review campaign,
I am still surprised that customer deposits reach one million dollars. not $200 million