You are the one that have said many times in this forum that the 1 MB limit isn't sane
I'm still arguing that, even though it's completely irrelevant to your theory that the Core developers want to "destroy bitcoin".
I think community should give you neg trust
Listen. If you have something personal with me, you can address it in the Reputation board. Negative trust is not given if someone's randomly accused of
admitting he's made a couple of shitposts, comparably to the rest . I'll be glad if you created a new topic, gathering all of my shitposts there, and perhaps reach out my campaign manager for their input. In my experience, though, professional managers don't just randomly hire shitposters, but you're free to question their decision-making.
Unfortunately for you, discussions in this space are predominantly paid.
What if you know the government's accounts ?
Government spending is publicly available, and politicians have funds-source declaration. Corruption in politics won't be resolved by reported Bitcoin addresses, because illicit activity like bravery happens with unreported funds in the first place.
The notion that with the absence of privacy, there will be absence of criminal activity and human corruption has long been debunked.