I trust lovesmayfamilis although in this case I think the red tag is unnecessary. There is no trading risk and it adds nothing to the neutral tag. Nobody is going to hire OP for a signature campaign if he just copypaste from ChatGPT. What happens is that, as it happens most of the time in these cases, this habit is just the tip of the iceberg and nutildah has already discovered that the OP is most likely part of an account farm.
You're right. I put a neutral tag, but this user did not react to it. In addition to the fact that I showed his posts on the topic of the use of AI, I regularly sent reports to the moderators.
Recently I came across his account again and saw that he was still rewriting texts on the forum that did not belong to him. If you do not react to such behavior, then you tacitly agree that AI is allowed here. If his posts with AI were isolated cases, perhaps one could turn a blind eye, but this is not the case.
All deleted posts from this user are the most common plagiarism from AI.
Well, in addition, I received a completely unfriendly letter from him, after which, alas, it will be impossible to remove the negative label from him.
