How does the constitution prevent the government from helping her citizens out of poverty, the government are there to serve and not to enrich each other with public funds. The government can passed laws and policy that'll make the country to be friendly to businesses and when they establish companies in the country, their citizens gets opportunity to be paid as they work one or multiplayer jobs. Poverty can't be totally eliminated though because it has been a part of humanity from the days of the Roman empire to modern day civilization but it can be reduced by providing job opportunities to those that are ready and willing to work. We'll always have those that prefer poverty as they're lazy and won't want to work their ways out of poverty but prefer to be sympathize with and given things. The government should use the public funds and established factories and other institution that'll create job for their citizens.


I don't know much about the western world  how their politics are been played there but over here, the government intentionally leave people in poverty because it benefits them. Things aren't been done for the masses instead it's been shared with in themselves and their relatives so when they come back for reelection and give little promises they can get the votes of hungry people that'll sell their vote for chicken change so that they can eat for just few days while the politicians return to eating public funds. Poverty can be reduced when the government are interested in doing so because they're expose to unlimited resources to use in achieving structures that will help with reducing poverty in the nation.