<cut>
However, JollyGood did not misquote. He intentionally modified the quote author. As he responded as if I were the one who made Don Pedro Dinero's post.
However, JollyGood did not misquote. He intentionally modified the quote author. As he responded as if I were the one who made Don Pedro Dinero's post.
I don't believe so. Here's how that part of the post should look without a quoting error:
If you really think the gambling board is as ethical as other boards this forum contains, you're out of touch with basic ethics.
Lol, guy that is willing to promote something that he thinks is highly unethical and exploitative for a little bit of bitcoin will teach us about ethics. 
What you need to do is to stop wearing a gambling ad on your signature, especially because you get paid for it. I don't know where you learned ethics, but where I'm from someone who lets himself be bought to advertise something he thinks is wrong is not only behaving in a morally wrong way, he is also a hypocrite.
Have you all read the same thing I did? What a stunning way for this deranged person to contradict himself.All of you go back to the gambling board where you all came from and belong. If you can't read and understand a high IQ post, don't respond to it with bs personal attacks about my signature.
I'm not a hypocrite for taking opportunity when it's available. And just because I wear a signature, thsn doesn't mean that should be a main focus to my valid opinion on a topic.
All of you have a common theme - low IQ.
There you have it ladies and gentlemen of this wonderful forum our ours. According to this member, we all have low IQ and as for him he does not mind outing himself as a hypocrite by applying to join signature campaigns (which he is convinced are promoting scams) just be because he does not want to miss the opportunity to earn some BTC.I'm not a hypocrite for taking opportunity when it's available. And just because I wear a signature, thsn doesn't mean that should be a main focus to my valid opinion on a topic.
All of you have a common theme - low IQ.
<snip>
As you can see, his post makes sense logically.
He replied to Rikfip's post first, talking about you in the third person. Then, he replied to Don Pedro Dinero, essentially agreeing with him and starting with the rhetorical question, "Have you all read the same thing I did?" He continued to refer to you in the third person. He also quoted part of your post about "high IQ/low IQ" members to support his argument and concluded sarcastically, still referring to you in the third person. In the continuation of the post, he replied to other members by quoting their posts, specifically cryptofrka and Findingnemo.
If I had made the post that Don Pedro Dinero had made, then indeed, I would be deranged and JollyGood would be right, what he quoted looks like I am deranged and that I've stunningly contradicted myself.
Actually, the contradictory part comes after your statement that gambling is unethical, which Don Pedro Dinero quoted, and after he pointed out the fact that you continue to wear a gambling signature and receive payment for it. You have to consider the whole context, not just the part that Don Pedro Dinero said.
I see where you are coming from, however it is too convenient to say that this was not in some way orchestrated by JollyGood.
Since you believe your argument and unless you are certain about your conclusion, then we must agree to disagree to prevent a subjective spiral.
I have my belief based on JollyGood's pattern of conduct. You have yours based on your basis.
Let's leave it at that, shall we?
I will be locking this thread after 72 hours of inactivity.