There's no way Paris Saint Germaine's poor result against Clermont can be associated with the club's limited finances because Paris Saint Germaine were very active in the summer transfer window after their former star players like Lionel Messi, Neymar Jnr and Marco and Verrati left the club. The club made sure they signed quality players that'll replace them and help them win matches week in week out but have been unfortunate to see same players not struggling to score a goal against a team like Clermont.
This is my first time to see someone was seeing the bad performance from the club has relationship with the financial condition of club.
PSG has been declared as one more valuable football club this time.
Valued at between USD 4.2 and 4.8bn (equivalent to between EUR 3.8 and 4.2bn) by Forbes and Brand Finance respectively, Paris Saint-Germain remains one of the most attractive clubs in the world, rated fourth in terms of brand value by Brand Finance and seventh by Forbes.
https://en.psg.fr/teams/club/content/paris-saint-germain-valued-at-over-usd-4-billion-by-forbes-and-brand-finance-2022-2023#I don't even know why people were calling the final condition has affected the performance of the club. PSG is not even facing financial crisis, and it was buying so many players during the winter transfer season. It sounds nonsense to call that if PSG has trouble with its performance due to the financial condition. PSG was a club with the biggest valuation in the league 1. My logic can't even think properly about how people linked the finalcial condition to the performance.
It doesn't even make sense. PSG does have some new stars but these guys were not as good as messi and neymar.