I already acknowledged that
Do you also acknowledge that you have shared your permission to reject coinjoins with them? One baby step at a time.
How do you respond to the allegations that, quite clearly, zkSNACKs is in one way or another funding and cooperating with blockchain analysis company/companies? This is what you seem to be avoiding while addressing other questions.
zkSNACKs queries a data aggregation company to attempt to avoid accepting stolen funds for their coinjoin service. I don't know how effective or ineffective this precaution is in regards to false positives or false negatives.
How can we verify your claim? zkSNACKs has never asserted they are trying to avoid accepting stolen funds. In their blog, they only said they sacrificed censorship resistance for the survival of their butts. They left it there.
There might come a time when we have to go with one of these "less controversial options," but we should be ready to say goodbye to innovation.
You should be ready to say goodbye to innovation if the default coordination shuts down... Totally decentralized.
