I don't understand why bookmakers give such high odds for Fulham (4.0) vs Chelsea (2.0)... Chelsea have only managed to score one goal in September... I won't say how Chelsea are playing away this season... Of course there could be a draw today, but I think Fulham have a better chance of winning...
Should i say the bookmakers are always right or they do some predictions base on preference? The odds are not unusual to me and base on the current performance of Chelsea, they will give them that odd. But another convincing thought is the fact of how they played and win against Brighton in the EFL cup, if that is well considered, then the odds for Chelsea might be higher than this. It’s all good though, let’s see how this match is going to turn out in the end later tonight.
We always underestimate Harry Maguire whether we realize it or not, but now everyone is aware that Harry Maguire is not always wrong because he is part of the Manchester United players. I applaud his mentality of never giving up even though he is often criticized. And it proves that Harry Maguire still gets the chance to play. Now Manchester United's playing mistakes mostly come from strikers. Rashford is one of the players that I think is most often talked about in the media. Not only that, Bruno is also widely associated with his selfish game.
Interesting to see now, the table is now turning around. When a player receives criticism, it is for them to be better and not bully them with that. With all the criticism Harry Maguire has received, Manchester United still kept him and still gets to play. Before the criticism started, he was the best defender in Manchester United and was praised well for his performance but after some times, players do lose form and that was the case of Harry Maguire and that can happen to any player. Rashford and Bruno are now talked about often than before because of their poor performance but they still have the chance to improve now before they’ll be considered a second choice in the team.