While I understand some concerns of members behind mass-cancelling Wasabi for performing AML screening of submitted UTXO's because I also consider it a bad practice, I am not sure why nobody haven't launched a non-AML community coordinator yet and haven't made a PR on Wasabi github adding a switch between zkSNACKs and community coordinators to the UI, since all the stack is fully open-source.

All I have found was some other thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5402254.0 with o_e_l_e_o convincing everyone for not doing so with the one and only argument of supposedly not having enough liquidity, where a whole thread followed and agreed with it, which seemed to be a dubious decision after all, based on the continuous popularity of this particular thread here and its current page count of 49. Instead of all that energy spent to blame and cancel Wasabi, someone at least could've tried to launch an alternative coordinator already and promote it in this thread in order to try gaining liquidity.

Cancelling a whole open-source solution doesn't seem correct just because a maintainer's backend instance has weird policies. With this same logic, you can go raid BestChange's thread blaming them for widespreading an idea that confiscaing users funds for high risk scores is good, which is actually evil because they punish and exclude exchanges who don't want to make scam-oriented ToS and participate in "dirty bitcoin" propaganda, lead by BestChange and their close (if not directly-related...) partner AMLBot with their outdated databases since Elliptic has dropped them as a customer. Almost on every exchange's review page there are people who lost their funds to scam-oriented ToS among "AML/KYC incidents".

Wasabi's private coordinator seamlessly checks submitted UTXO's at Coinfirm's AML API and rejects high-risk ones without asking for identity or confiscating user funds. Rejected UTXO's can't be linked to any identity. This also can be used to check a risk score of your funds for free without recurring to scam services like AMLBot who even freeze their own users funds for purchasing AML checks with high-risk coins.

Given that same users who blame and cancel Wasabi in this thread participate in BestChange's thread without blaming and cancelling BestChange for attacking Bitcoin's fungibility and spreading scam services is absolutely ridiculous. Bitcointalk members who cancel Wasabi but use BestChange are hypocrites. If your idea is to cancel all services who attack Bitcoin's fungibility, then please do it properly (like also stopping to use centralized exchanges who do AML screening and practice funds freezing) and not selectively.