I've looked at the
post but benefits of efficiency can't be better to privacy concerns. If they're giving 40% better anon sets for coinjoin outputs it's impressive. What's worrying ppl is their spying with blockchain analysis companies.
When zkSNACKs rejects coinjoins's it's taking away Bitcoin's creative foundation from fungible origins. zkSNACKs can't say they believe in privacy if they're spying on you at the same time. If Wasabi wallet's got other benefits it doesn't help ppl against their blockchain analysis policy.
zkSNACKs doesn't have the ability to spy on you. I can't really say the same thing about Unijoin which you are promoting. Unijoin basically plagiarized Wasabi's
legal documents for their own terms & conditions but what they didn't copy was the open source and non-custodial aspects. Not only are you paying much higher fees but you also give up custody and have to take their word about not having logs when they have every motive to lie since user data is their only leverage when law enforcement decides to shut them down.