Quote from: slapper on September 28, 2023, 12:43:05 AM

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on September 28, 2023, 12:12:13 AM

Quote from: Ojima-ojo on September 19, 2023, 05:59:02 PM

~snip~

I think something, always when things are transparent things should be done like a casino apart from reading the Tos, which is something annoying and slow, because it is an imperative duty, these things should not be left lightly, we as well Players must set an example, now having said this, 'for me one thing is certain, every time we enter a casino we always check what the KYC is like, there is no other way but to see what it is about, first because things They must be made from a casino and taken into consideration, I have taken as a forecast that if I am interested in a casino, I would prefer to do the KYC first, and see to what extent that KYC helps me to make a withdrawal, because as they have said, the casinos have different levels of KYC, I imagine it is a couple of minutes, so for me this should go as the first option before making any deposit, but I have already taken that option if I am really interested in a casino, because then going through the terrible moment that sometimes At the time of withdrawal, do they ask me for a KYC? It is something that I would not like to happen, however I am one of the people who accept that the new regulations ask or require KYC, I was reading somewhere that there are casinos that sometimes do not say it at once, but that each KYC is done as an additional condition, or a very hidden term there, then it doesn't seem fair to me.

Each casino has its own style, so when there are these types of things that are so flashy and so delicate, I have read in the forum in many threads where there are many users who feel deceived, because they are usually told in the casinos at the time of register that they do not need KYC, but at the time of withdrawal if they require it, then they are told that only some users require KYC, it is like politics, something like that, then when things are widely demonstrated that it is necessary a KYC, false advertising is not good, because later it is much more difficult to do it.

It's such a pain, isn’t it? Every casino, in my opinion, should be completely transparent about their KYC. It's unfair to keep players in the dark and then reveal the information when they try to make a withdrawal. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth when I see such practices. I agree with you that it's best to take care of the KYC stuff up front. This way, I don't have any surprises later on. I understand the inconvenience, but the benefits to my sanity are well worth it. I think it's critical that we, as players, insist on honesty and fair play from online casino

The KYC process will always be annoying from the beginning or any other time. 'but I think that to make it smoother, without any type of adjustments and improve from the beginning, of course, this for the casinos that we have previously put as the best for that, without emago I am one of those who think that when it's time Doing a KYC should be done with the maximum number of documents we have, because it is not known when we have to make a withdrawal of any type, it is better to do it with the greatest number of coupons, if you win big then you can withdraw big , we can never stop thinking about the good possibilities, we are notorious players who at any time can count on a good touch of luck and that can make the difference, and I only recommend doing the KYC for our favorite sites, not for everyone because for Not all of them are worth it , because we do not know the scope of them It is to make the entire process better.

When we are in a casino we must know how to choose the best one so that it adapts to our taste. I have always said that the Best casinos are the old ones because they have gone through processes that are quite large, trustworthy, have a high reputation and have a lot of knowledge about The players , of course that includes the processes that are quite strong, have already overcome some risks of being hacked and all that weighs, because I am not going to trust a new casino, where I don't even know what the limits of their security are and how good they are with the custody of the funds , because very well there could be a new casino and then they hack it and they say that it was not their fault and that Everything was stolen from them , since they do not have the capacity to answer for the stolen funds, since it is something that they They can argue , then in that order of ideas things can go like this, and what happens ? who is blamed ? They can have all the funds , and Things can Still go to nothing.