That's the logic I like better, thanks

But I'll add a correction too. For some reason you have chosen a model where someone works for someone else, i.e. for an employer. But this is one of the models. For example you can be an investor who just invests money, or you can work "for yourself" by creating your own business. Therefore, you are considering only one scenario. Not the best, but I agree - mass for the majority of the population. But in this option - disposes of remuneration ... the employer! And it depends only on him - what working conditions she offered you, and when he paid the money. Which in turn (we'll dismiss negative scenarios) may depend on the actions or inactions of other people.
Well here's the thing, either you are an employee or an employer. When you work for others, you are getting paid from them. And as you said about business, some other people are getting paid by you because they are working for you. Their living is coming through your hand. Or if you doing the whole business on your own, then you are selling things to get paid by others(buyers). The main focus is work. If you work, you get paid. I just used that example to prove this point.
More precisely in this case it all depends on the purchasing power of the people in your country... Doesn't reality look more logical ?
People like logical statements better. Because whether you are religious or not, it will make sense. But the logical things could be manipulated. Imagine someone talking total BS but he is able to explain that with some logic. People will believe that. This is what politicians do. Well, that's just another topic. But yeah, if something can be proven from every perspective, then we are bound to believe it. And work to earn is an eternal truth. So no doubt in that.