I think every bounty manager has a disclaimer posted that they will have no control over the decisions of the project’s movements and plans especially the token distribution. As a hunter you should always be aware and acknowledging the risks like this.
I’ve participated in some projects being managed by irfan_pak10 back in the past and I’ve got no problem with that. But I think the best practice for bounty managers and projects is to put these allocated tokens to an escrow service for transparency purposes.
The decisions of the project like COMBO is something that irfan_pak10 can’t control because the final say will always be in the project itself.
If memory serves correct there was a time when bounty managers could (or did) take payments in advance using BTC or ETH but that was around the time when the ICO craze was at a peak. Also, when projects stopped paying in advance the release of bounties was usually locked in to the distribution of tokens after they were released. It is safer for bounty managers and participants to have some sort of guarantee/escrow but that would mean non-project tokens therefore project owners could be reluctant to go down that route.
Take some time to read OP before replying then. This is what OP said. When he said irfan_pak10 will pay the hunters, it means he doesn't know who will pay.
And just to confirm you that part of my response was to Rikafip (in case you can't see what is what)
Read the context of the replies when members put forward their views.