Let me be direct: Why is everyone under the impression that Arsenal, even at home, can beat Manchester City? They're without Debruyne and Rodri, but don't kid ourselves! Manchester City is lauded on merit. Their team, even when disorganized, is difficult, right? The idea that their absence will hobble City bothers me. In their recent matches against Arsenal, this club has shown impressive skill and planning, winning and drawing. Could team loyalty's political nature be clouding reasonable judgment? Arsenal, while wonderful, need more than home turf advantage to win this match, and I for one am not convinced
Well City might be the best team in the league so far, but don't forget that they're not very invisible, they've been beat twice by Newcastle in the Caraboa Cup and Wolverhampton in the EPL last week, therefore there's a possibility that Arsenal could beat them as well, even though Manchester City are more favourable than win the game, also Arsenal beat them in the community shield with their complete squad but they'll be without 2 of their key players which gives more chances for Arsenal to take advantage of.
Both teams really need to win the game and that's why it would be a very tough game and uneasy to decide and i feel it might end up like their community shield match, cause Arsenal also might be playing without their star player Saka.