[edited out]
What? Hahaha. OK, are you saying that in a recession environment and during a phase when the Federal Reserve and other Central Banks around the world are fighting inflation through Rate Hikes and Quantitative Tightening, WHICH will also cause phases of monetary DEFLATION = It's a biased take to say that there's a higher probability that prices of stocks and commodities, many other assets could crash?
I doubt that I am saying that, even though I am saying that you are likely not as unbiased and objective as you are striving to put yourself out to be.
IF you're saying it's "biased" merely because it was I who posted it, then that's ad hominem, ser.

Oh gosh, you really can be a goofball sometimes with your fairly lame attempts at applying logical fallacies.
Whatever I might have had said, it is quite likely that I am not attacking you, but instead attacking your arguments.. and sure. .throw in a bit of flare, here and there for funzies and call you a goofball. hahahaha.
I suppose ultimately my already used words speak for themselves in the sense that I was somewhat attacking you in terms of your seeming attempts to act and/or present yourself as if you have some kind of a great grasp on macro factors and therefore presuming that bitcoin's price performance is also going to need to be correlated to things that might happen in the macro-world, even if we presume the things that you say to happen in the macro world were to play out as you already "objectively" and "unbiasedly" described, which is also far from a given, even if like you said, you are merely describing what you believe to be "greater likelihoods" blah blah blah.