I understand that Manchester City needed almost all the players that they had to actually achieve the success that they did. It wouldn’t have happened by only having HAALAND. but at the same time, he was a big performer for them as well. I would not say that Manchester United actually would have been able to win all the trophies that they did without Haaland. They even used him as a bait. He was performing so well that the opponent actually guarded him all the time and while doing so left holes in the defense which Manchester City was able to exploit.
Anyway, I always think that a player should not move to another club if he does not find anything uncomfortable with his current club. So I don’t think he should move. At least not now.
Did you get to watch the game against Arsenal today? Erling Haaland was present in the game and at the same time, absent. Whenever, these important players are not within to support, he will be less effective.
Last season, during this match day, he has already scored more than fifteen league goals for Manchester City. He hasn't don't so you know why? I'll leave you to go do the findings for yourself.
At Borrussia Dortmund he was a good goal scorer with players that also assisted , but at City, Pep Guardiola is playing all around him and without supplies, how do he get goals? Tough game, you should visit troll football on twitter. They cracked a good joke about Erling Haaland and his parents. Hehehe!
The trolls don't care who they joke about, Arsenal won today, and the whole City lost, not just Haaland. If it weren’t for the cowardly referee, City would have played 1.5 halves in the minority after Kovacic was sent off and the score would have been more indecent. Haaland has not performed well in big games so far, but I think this does not matter much because on average he performs at a top level.