Are these newbie shills paid by zkSNACKs or is zkSNACKs behind those accounts? This entire thread is becoming a mess.
I believe not, that would be too obvious. If someone is playing 4D Chess, it would probably an entity that's against zkSNACKs paying those shills and have the posters of the topic blame it on zkSNACKs?
🤔
It's an advantage to have access to all of the open source code for Wasabi wallet but we don't know what's happening to data inside zkSNACKs servers so independent audits would've reassured Wasabi Wallet users.
I can only speak for the protocol that Wasabi wallet uses but based on that, there is not much personal information that the coordinator could leak. So although I do not approve what zkSNACKs is doing, if the protocol works as explained in docs, they cannot compromise the users' privacy apart from sharing UTXO that participates in coinjoin. An audit would be useful to know if the protocol works exactly as explained.
Plus an audit to the blockchain analysis companies that filter the UTXOs. The users should be given the right to refute the "true positives" flagged by them. Because if it can't be refuted, then it's not credible. How would the users know that they're not pulling data arbitrarily.