Note that if you combine all of your UTXOs to one address using a single transaction, any blockchain analysis software will know that a single person owns all of the addresses.
It is probably better to leave them like that if the inputs are large enough, i.e. no 10000 sat outputs lying around, and to combine only the dust inputs (even better, send the consolidation transaction through through a mixer first)
As I have already mentioned the consolidation via mixer is overkill. Fake conjoin does its job perfectly and never consolidates into single address. To be true I think the used "fake conjon" term for such Sparow's transactions is unsuitable and misleading. I would rather call them "fake batch" transactions, but, unfortunately, what already exists can’t be changed.