What does this have to do with what you quoted? Why can't you just admit you were wrong that having other participants remix increases your privacy and is not a flaw?
Act as if you don't understand. I'm absolutely not going to stick with wording with you.
The reused addresses in that transaction are the coordinator fees paid to Samourai from Whirlpool tx0 transactions.
Thanks for agreeing with me that this isn't a coinjoin but a transaction in which they consolidate their whirlpool fees. So how is it relevant with Wasabi reusing addresses during the coinjoin process?
I asked them why they are reusing the addresses deliberately but they refused to respond
I mean, completely reasonable. They are literally saying that whirlpool mix cannot have address reuse as the coordinator would refuse it, responding to Vlad who's gaslighting their work by bullying them for their fee consolidation transaction, and you're making the question with the most obvious answer; you're a troll, man.
Yes, if show me a Whirlpool entry address, you will have created a traceable toxic change output (unless you happened to have a UTXO of the exact size of the pool + pool fee) that can be linked to it
Okay, good luck: 62d30dc1aa097465ae81b81f39015bf2af5d385e88858b47de8248589669cc1a.