I'd want to hear Satoshi's opinions on past Bitcoin development and Bitcoin's current state in general solely due to curiosity, but it will be a net negative for the entire space. Why? People will be too biased to side with whatever Satoshi's opinions are.
I understand. It's natural to be curious about what Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin, thinks about the cryptocurrency's development and current state. However, I agree that it would be a net negative for the entire space if Satoshi were to publicly share their opinions.
One reason for this is that people would be too biased to side with whatever Satoshi's opinions are. Satoshi is a revered figure in the Bitcoin community, and their opinions would carry a lot of weight. As a result, people would be more likely to accept Satoshi's opinions as fact, even if they are not. This could lead to a less informed and more divided community.
Another reason why it would be a net negative for Satoshi to share their opinions is that it could stifle innovation. If people are too focused on what Satoshi thinks, they may be less likely to explore new ideas or challenge the status quo. This could slow down the development of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
Of course, there are also some potential benefits to Satoshi sharing their opinions. For example, it could help to clarify the original vision for Bitcoin and provide guidance to the community. However, I believe that the risks outweigh the potential benefits.
Overall, I think it's best for Satoshi to remain anonymous and let Bitcoin develop on its own terms.