Especially since this is not the first such case, as I understand it.
You mean his getting tokens and not sending to bounty hunters or saying that tokens were escrowed while they actually weren't? Or both?No, I meant in the sense that this is not the first case of complaints about Murat's unprofessionalism in running bounty campaigns. Badly worded.
For example, there was this case when he deleted all participants from the signature campaign after 6 weeks of promotion. I do not recall following the case back then, and I only came across it now. But surprisingly, none of the DT members took any action, and Murat did not provide any explanation in that thread either. Imagine what would happen if that was a campaign in the Services board!
His response on TG was: "There is less than 3 legit participants and we decided to cancel the signature campaign"
Then there was the case between him and bitbollo, when he left a retaliatory negative trust just because someone dared to question his managerial abilities.
Planning to sell the token is a wrong decision. You do not decide the fate of the tokens that are not yours.
Calculate the percentage of taken from the given tokens. Ask the hunters to send the gas fees. Whoever will send the fees, give them their tokens. You need to be more active in threads like this to understand and receive suggestions from forum members.
Calculate the percentage of taken from the given tokens. Ask the hunters to send the gas fees. Whoever will send the fees, give them their tokens. You need to be more active in threads like this to understand and receive suggestions from forum members.
Exactly! The token sale should not have been his decision. As for gas fees, Murat never mentioned that it was an issue. Perhaps this was agreed upon as part of the deal between him and Metropoly.