To what extent is it acceptable to use AI to enhance regular forum posts?
Definitely not to this extent. I think it is not acceptable. And I believe many users, who make regular reports to
this thread would agree with me.
But I'd like to repeat it again, I'm not using AI to post for me.
Really? I only checked the last page of your posts.
Re: BTC or Gold Investment?I believe you should take a look at bitcoin. As you can see, many bitcoiners have demonstrated that they have made significant profits from the currency. It all depends on whether you are willing to take the risk. Many investors choose Bitcoin because of its rapid growth, but if you'd rather something more secure and low-risk, consider investing in gold. Here's the idea: To decide which of the two investments you should make, start with a small sum of money. For instance, you could invest the same amount in gold and bitcoin, then watch to see which one is more profitable and able to quickly recoup your initial investment.
Sapling AI Detector - 100% Fake
Writer AI Detector - 28% human-generated contentPlagium.com - this text is very likely generated by a machine.
I'd like to highlight a particular point here to show that your AI checking mechanism is incorrect. There's no valid argument in this case, and it seems like you haven't investigated thoroughly before making your post.
The post you mentioned was created on "July 25, 2022, 02:20:35 PM," and based on my research, ChatGPT (the only AI I'm aware of) was launched on November 30, 2022. So, how could a verifier predict that my post is AI-generated when it was created before the AI was introduced?
The point is, AI detectors aren't that accurate so don't fully rely on that.