Quote from: digaran on October 17, 2023, 08:22:22 PM

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on October 17, 2023, 05:23:03 PM

Like you said, we do not know the target, only the range.
So let's say the target's key is 199,999

Alrighty then, to be exact, when it comes to slapping me suddenly the secure random generator gives us 199,999? And when we are working with 6 digits then as an example use 14, 15 etc, suddenly we go high as 2^130 and compare the numbers?
So why not scaling up all the values and use actual 2^130 range/keys? Though you forgot that I was asking if the stride idea could be tweaked to find a perfect stride or not.

Even if the key is e.g, 189776, we could still divide the end range and subtract from our target by different subranges, like 200,000 - 189776 = 10224, we could then try subtracting the result from endrange/4, er/6, er/8 etc.

Nvm that, I don't know anything about math, I'm not even working actively on 130, my target is much bigger.

Btw, Legends_Never_Die is my alter ego account, time for a paint job on trust wall.😉

I know you are used to spitting out random things and some are like ooooohhhhh ahhhhhhhhh, but you seldom listen lol.

You could be working in a 50 bit range or a 256 bit range; and you can subtract, divide, multiply, etc. whatever you want to do, or you can use whatever stride you can some up with, 14, 87, 1234344564, 47398573854734834, etc., it won't work because again, you could go around the curve and you won't know where the key lies or where to start your stride function from.

There is truly only one way to take advantage of a stride function; and I stated that months ago. My problem was, I could not create a stride function inside of CUDA. Or else I would have found 130's key already lol.