A safe wallet is not a wallet that is only good because of its appearance, and it is not a wallet that tells prospective users that it is a safe wallet.
Your all points are so legit, and after reading all of the replies, I am so convinced to leave the usage of TW, but I only used it for Alts (basically for the bounty work), which is worth shit. I think, well, overall, the experience of using TW was good, and I have been using it for the last 2+ years. Note: I am not trying to
shill represent the TW like the Op did. ( and also not saying that OP shilled the TW.)
A safe wallet is a personal key wallet held by the user and has nothing to do with the developer.
It is not right because developers do matter, and how the app is programmed, whether it is closed source or open source, In the replies, you will find a user mention that the code on GitHub was not updated by the TW in the last 5 years, and they even mention on their website that they are open source, but in reality, they are not. It means they are hiding their errors and emissions.
If the wallet still has the possibility of accessing a number of important words (seed phrases), that is the worst wallet.
Like the Ledger Hardware wallet, the S recovery update can recover your seedphrases or wallet.