I don't know if there is really a payment for such a post in the first place, but if there is, it is not worth that much, around 0.01 BTC. I mean, the OP of that post really put some effort into creating a good image of the Tust wallet, but we all know with the information that Trust wallet is close source and cannot be aduited by the developers, so many will not prefer it for holding purposes even though it is a non-custodial wallet.
Oh c'mon, Joeyp! Is this the pinnacle of your creativity? you're really setting the bar low here, aren't you?
We've seen your wild and wacky theories before – at least they were entertaining. This, my friend, is neither interesting nor amusing. Step it up!
Haha, you should ask Joeyp, "Why so serious?", I also read that thread just today. Due to the topic of Joeyp, the story was really interesting and full of details. While reading that, I started to think that OP must be some type of storyteller, but when he started to explain the features of Trust Wallet, I also became skeptical that OP was promoting TrustWallet.
But why does he have to? I mean, there is no need for it. Trust Wallet is already so famous and used by a lot of people in the crypto market, but still, old competitors need some intentions too. But these intentions can be gotten from bad image too, like last time many people reported a bug in which the assets are shown in the explorer but are not visible in the wallet.