That seems to justify that many of us continue to clarify the situation and fight back against the ongoing attack that those who use the term try to act as if using the term crypto is some kind of an innocent and different way of talking about bitcoin, when it is not. Even if some of them likely do not have bad intentions, those of us who know better still likely have obligations to continue to beat them into the ground when they continue to use such term in vague, amorphous and meaningless ways.
Someone has to lead and explain it better. I have seen you defend them whenever someone used the crypto term referring to Bitcoin. I don't know If I was one of them to use the term "Crypto" to refer to Bitcoin. Even though it's not too bad to call "Bitcoin" a crypto, it's like you are calling a Man a human. Sometimes, people agree and sometimes disagree with it. But when people like you step up and explain in many words who have a long forum background, people think twice before they argue with you. So you are kind of the back of many people.
I have followed @JJG in other threads where he emphasized the need to be specific when referring to Bitcoin and the others. Like he mentioned, using crypto in a vague way can be misleading. It sends a wrong message to the uninformed when someone fall into the hands of mischief makers under the guise of cryptocurrency. So, it is always good to be specific about the choice of words.