To be honest if who the hell is the striker here? Mctominay or hojlund? From what i can see that if tominay is always become the guy who was putting his name in the score board which is unbelivable while hojlund like did nothing for the club.
Much like CR7's performances, where Ronaldo scored numerous goals when playing for clubs other than Man United. However, when the expensive striker dons the Man United jersey, it seems like a curse not to be able to find the back of the net. I'm more suspicious of tactics and player egos than inclined to castigate Hojlund's performance.
It's possible that the opportunities Hojlund had were ill-timed and not maximized to their full potential.
So what about buying a Mount? Shouldn't he be more aggressive than Hojlund? shouldered the burden of number 7 back but his contribution was very small. Hojlund is still effective and unselfish on the field. Because of this, he can play well on the front lines. I think Hojlund can work well together, in the UCL against Galatsaray he managed to contribute 2 goals and 1 goal against Bayern Munich even though he ultimately lost but it is clear that Hojlund can be relied on.
Maguire's blunders always make for a hot-selling item on news portals. Hence, the player may appear to have a poor performance, even though good play isn't always in the media spotlight, which is why his name is more associated with mistakes.
Maguire still rightfully deserves to be a defender for Manchester United at present.
After being removed from the captain's armband, Harry Maguire became freer to play and proved himself by contributing in every match. trying his best to continue to maintain his playing time and place in the starting eleven. In his last 3 matches, Harry Maguire has received positive ratings, so I hope that he can be consistent and minimize the mistakes he often made last season.