The consequence of your guideline and using me as an example of this false label of hypocrisy is that you have no one who is incentivized to think objectively and against the unhealthy gambling nature in that board.
You're promoting a gambling site through your signature which means you have to be writing on the gambling board, there's a request for a merit source for the board that'll obviously increase the post quality of the board as member try to write better to increase their chances of been merited but no, you opposed because you enjoy the spam going on on the board as it helps you complete your post count and gets you paid with the excuse that you want to take the money the casinos for yourself (that it's better with you than with them). This just goes to show your true nature, you say the casino are scamming the gamblers then why don't you fight against that by not having anything to do with the gambling sites but guess you can't do without the signature payouts which just makes you a hypocrite and a perfect example to the second point of this thread.
This might be the last respond you get from me because I can see you aren't adding any valuable discussion to this thread and I won't do you the honors of giving you more reason to fish for your weekly post on this thread. People found this thread useful that's why they resurrected it, I don't know who did that but thank you for that. Again I said you mightn't find the thread valuable to you but your stupidity can't be forced on others. We have those that'll find the thread useful and those are the targeted audience not a hypocrite just chasing after money without any moral values.
@CryptopreneuerBrainboss a very interesting topic and as i have seen there are already two translations with the indonesian and filipino. i have now published this thread in the
AOBT thread and asked that all aobt members translate it then in the respective languages
Saying that I spam on the board is very far from the truth. I do not spam in that board, I advocate against casinos and their usage because I am for the people, not for the casinos. Does that mean my posts are spam? Absolutely not. Does that mean all of my posts are advocating against gambling/casinos? Absolutely not. I post in topics that interest me there, period.
Also, whether a merit source is there or not will make no difference to whether I post there or not. If I was a spammer, Little Mouse and Royse777 wouldn't allow me into their campaigns. The truth is, my posts are if anything of higher quality than majority of the other posts in that board.
I opposed to the merit source idea because I believe that it will increase spam there. The incentives provided by casinos already causes inflation of posting in that board, and the addition of merit sources would only increase the incentive to post there....thus, more spam. Casinos and people like you may like the idea, but neither think of the negatives, corruption and poor quality that already exists, and how that might get worse. Who is really blinded by the dollars?
I also already said to you multiple times in multiple ways about having an
advertisement in my signature. Just because I don't like the gambling business, doesn't mean I won't take their money for having an advertisement in my signature. Doesn't mean I am a hypocrite either. Hypocracy would be if I was in my position but then
personally endorsed casinos with my words and my posts. That would be hypocracy. However,
signatures are not personal endorsements and never will be. M
My only prerequisite before advertising is that they are not a scam, which I rely on my own due diligence and the campaign managers to ensure. I trust Little Mouse and Royse777 when it comes to this and they are generally the campaign managers that I prefer to work with. They also understand where I stand and why they allow me to join their campaigns, even if they're gambling related. Why? Because overall, I am a high quality poster. I am genuinely interested in being on this forum, I like to converse, and ultimately, I add value to threads. If that was not the case, I would struggle to be accepted into a campaign. That's not a brag, that's reality.
You might think I am not adding value to this thread, I probably agree with you...that's because the only reason I am here is because you are creating rules when you have no authority to do so, and mislabeling people with rules and guidelines like the one involving me, which is inaccurate.
I ask you again to reconsider your usage of my profile in the OP of your thread, as it is inaccurate