Comparing Erling Haaland to Son is completely out of the question because there is a substantial distinction between a player who is spoonfed hundreds of passes just for him to score and players who hustle their way out for this goals ranking. What I'm trying to comprehend completely is Son is more effective with footings on the ball than Erling Haaland who is only in it for the goals. Son Heung-Min's performance has improved since Harry Kane's departure from Tottenham this summer. All the weights that have circulated the Englishman have turned out to face Son, and he is ready to lead his squad to glory. Angelos Postecoglou, the new manager, is also an amazing piece of creativity that supports his players in competing for the EPL crown this season.
I'm glad you have same observation as mine, few weeks back before the international break, I watch one of the games Manchester city played in the premier league and I observed erling haaland carefully and came to a conclusion that he was typically a goal scorer but some other person's argued vhemently with me saying he is rather creative, but I still maintained my stands.
Haaland is a good play no doubts but on thing is sure if he were to be placed in such position as son, where he has to make the play, create the chances and score a goal, I don't think he will do better, son is a play maker, creative and hustles for his ball mean while haaland on the other hand as good good team mates up on which he is some how dependent upon, so the comparison doesn't have matching points.