--snip--
Very reasonable that they forbid to sell purely their code, but they allow to use it in any other commercial product and sell those products based on their software. Again, according to the definition of MIT-licence the software which is liable to it is open source. I have never encountered the contradictions to this coming from reputable sources.
FOSS and open source are two different things.
While others already clarify why CC isn't open source, i'd like to mention "Free" in FOSS actually refer to freedom or liberty, not money.