I gave my opinion at the time, new Casinos are a "lottery". Anyway, the long road belongs to you: "User165230" a real shame.
Well, since they are growing, Leebet(!?), which we assume it, then, I hope they include improving the withdrawal clauses, which... must, yes or yes, be improved, and what better way to include to "User165230" , and, of course all outstanding debts that exist...
That in itself would show that the Casino is "healthy" that they are growing and that traffic has improved.
No player should bear and no Casino, which is on the way to being a consolidated Casino, should not maintain a withdrawal debt of more than 6 months with any player, at least not in cases where the player makes use of the allowed bets*.
Finally thanks to BTCGOSU for sticking to the motto:
"At BTCGOSU, we take pride in being players first and affiliates second. "
*:
▶ Game date: 24/10/2023
▶ Casino name: LeeBet Casino
▶ Win multiplier: x1495x
▶ Stake: $80 ($8,000 Bonus Buy)
▶ Win: $119,672.00
source:https://www.btcgosu.com/win-images/sweet-bonanza-120000-win-leebet-biggest-gosu-win-everThen, yes, it is true the Toc are there, but if you allow that type of bets, you know that the winners due to pending withdrawal will be there latent to happen...
One of the things " annoying" for some players are the betting limits, well a casino should be careful with this and not rely on a rule to protect themselves, there is undoubtedly an ambiguity, of course the player should know it.
Anyway, a quite "expensive" review that "User165230" has given us and whether you like it or not, Leebet, the ambiguity in allowing large bets, in ignorance of the players, is bad publicity for you and you have managed to turn the player into a Martyr ("User165230" ) and not on a winner.