Re: Advertised services and participants in a paid sig campaign
But is that surprising coming from someone who posts this 3 weeks after joining up a BTC mixer's sig campaign?
This falls squarely within the scope of the questions posed by 1miau: is a user who doesn't have the slightest idea about a product, credible to promote it?
In any case, it's up to the manager to make his own decisions. But I'm not sure that in these cases, this will be beneficial to the community in terms of credibility.
I have been following the sinbad avatar campaign for 3 weeks. Today I just understood that in some cases, hiding bitcoin transactions may be necessary to protect our privacy from the public or for certain purposes. I have never had experience using a mixer, and if I may ask. How much does it cost for one mix? Service fees and network fees. Maybe I want to try it
Sorry, maybe my question is very basic, but I have no experience with mixers and I don't have much bitcoin so I thought I'd find out the actual costs involved. I hope those who answer have experience using a Sinbad mixer
Sorry, maybe my question is very basic, but I have no experience with mixers and I don't have much bitcoin so I thought I'd find out the actual costs involved. I hope those who answer have experience using a Sinbad mixer
This falls squarely within the scope of the questions posed by 1miau: is a user who doesn't have the slightest idea about a product, credible to promote it?
In any case, it's up to the manager to make his own decisions. But I'm not sure that in these cases, this will be beneficial to the community in terms of credibility.
You mean I can't question that? and I can't join the mixer campaign?
You can suggest to the campaign manager to remove me or suggest to the campaign manager if they are looking for campaign participants then ask them whether they have knowledge about the service or not.
Emmmhhh.. But it doesn't seem like that's your goal, you're just looking down on me.. It doesn't matter, I'm not a good poster
Maybe you think that if BenCoodie doesn't agree with gambling then it's better if he doesn't join the gambling campaign and if he has joined the gambling campaign then don't express his disagreement with gambling openly, is that like that?
The boldened part. Either he hates gambling and opposes it or he doesn't hate it and doesn't oppose it, then, he's eligible to wear a paid signature. No one is forced here to participate in signature campaigns of services, they don't like.
Opposing gambling and getting paid the same time for advertising gambling via signature isn't credible at all.
In the end, none of us can decide, only the campaign manager himself can decide. Maybe the longer this thread exists will only make BenCodie's reputation questionable, if that is one of your goals, then you can open this thread longer.