Overall there's potential but still work to be done. Don't get discouraged though - take the feedback and run with it!
I don't know why it has become a common occurrence to open a topic with a discussion about their project, and after that only ignoring and not being interested in the feedback given by other users.
Btw, some of the news content looks to be AI-generated, is this intended? I found one or two sentences very familiar with sentences from a book, while the rest are similar to other sources. I don't think people would like AI-generated content if what they want is factuality and accuracy,
I see content that contains AI and after checking in several detectors, it is almost 99% AI, so this article is not original writing but is generated by AI, if this is like this of course I don't like it.
AI-generated content doesn't necessarily have to be spammy and uninteresting. With proper use, and asking precise questions and tasks, AI can help create attractive content.
When you start a website the primary goal is to get traffic. Google after its own AI content generator known Bard is not ranking down contents which have been generated by an AI. Unless the content doesn't make any correlation to the topic and has relevant information that covers every aspect, it will get rank on the first page. The trick is always to generate content that is unique or based trending topics.
While human written content still make to the top without the same criteria. The difference is how much the content adds value and whether it makes some unique difference to an AI based content.