Therefore, we should select the campaigns carefully and if we hate gambling, think gambling is harmful and we oppose gambling, it's hypocritical to join such a gambling campaign just for the sake of getting a few sats.
As a participant in such a campaign, we should be able to say about the service: "yes, the advertised service is a service I can get behind"
It's obvious that while people joined a high paying campaign is not because of the brand they advertise, and I notice that reputable members doesn't join a campaign because the campaign is paying high or not, what they concentrate in a campaign is about what they are promoting which is the most necessary thing to do in brand..
Some people do not work according to instructions of a signature campaign when they joined a campaign..as you stated that some people post in a gambling section whereas their brand doesn't accept that but they continued making a post there, I think its abnormal from my understanding and my views..last week Best_Change has officially made it known to some of the participants that doesn't abid on the rules and regulations of the campaign, if you know you are in interested in posting where the signature campaign you are promoting as you not to post, I think its better to leave the campaign instead going against their rules and regulations.
Sometimes some signature don't like their participants to post in gambling section even in the politics and societies section but some participants doesn't adhere to that,while they know that the brand they are projecting don't like them posting in such sections, so I don't know what some participants see for disobeying the brand their promoting, for them to go against the rules and regulations that means they don't want a development and the growth of the campaign contrary that is what it means.