It's one of question which differs from person to person. How do you define richness?
Becoming rich is not all about financial stability; it comprises many things. Those who are not yet rich will think that being rich is all about financial stability. For me, if you can have access to money, health, food, and shelter, even though you don’t have a lot of cash in your account or wallet, you are rich.For instance, a rich man will have a lot of money in his account or wallet, but suffering from severe illnesses that will cost more than his wealth of almost all his properties makes him not a rich man but rather a poor man, because a poor man who has access to money and solves all his issues with adequate health care, then the poor man is richer than the rich man, so being rich is not just about financial stability but also comprises other factors.
Isn't it an interesting, and regrettable, oversight that so many associate wealth with only material rich? After all, how often do we witness individuals with substantial financial resources leading meaningless lives? It's actually more complex than that. Alright, let's be frank. Cash is a tool, not a goal. Rich people who struggle with health problems or lack meaningful relationships are like receiving a gorgeous automobile without an engine. It's all a front.
Here's another viewpoint, though. Richness in the current economy refers to more than just financial assets because capital flows are varied and dynamic. Time, wisdom, health, connections, and even peace of mind are all examples of richness. Although it's a vital aspect of modern life, having money isn't the only measure of wealth. Isn't it time, then, to change the way we think about richness and see it as a spectrum rather than merely a figure on a balance sheet?