How many different tools you used to try detect it whether he used AI to write those posts,as one is usually not enough?
As you can see from the images, I used three different tools and loaded them with different samples so we can be sure. I even quoted the whole paragraph and not individual parts of it to be even more fair. Copy-pasting the content of the quotes in the depicted tools will replicate the result.
I am asking because if those posts that you shared are made with AI, this guy used the shittiest chatbot I've seen so far.
Stake campaign managers oddly enough seem to reward post length instead of any other important aspect of posts. Oftentimes the responses are off topic and seem to be writter in a way that a human would never write, let alone respond to another human. Trying to read these posts gives me the sensation that I'm getting a stroke.
Hello, it catches my attention that you say that, how would I be able to use AI to make my posts? So that? What sense does it have? One of the most reliable tools is the opensource AI GPT detector, which is very reliable, I don't think there is any pattern for you to be able to say that, if you look at it I always give my opinion with the same consistency in everything, because in case That they were posts written with AI would be something that in the campaign the experts who review the posts would have already detected , right?
The tools you use are not reliable, in fact the most reliable is opensource (
https://openai-openai-detector.hf.space/), although it is only as a guide, because remember that the AI tools and detection are in demo/beta mode. The fact that it has a tag created there, Yes , was due to an Error that I had During a difficult time , which is why it is not worth Mentioning , but that does not mean that it is Currently so you Should stop Using your alt and put it with your real User.