Yeah, but to be fair, I did not really say governments because I hedged with poor people, so my answer was waffling. and I am not even sure how we can predict the various onboarding, but don't poor people frequently get screwed, and sure there will be some status quo rich people who also hold out a long time... so I am not even going to proclaim to have much if any clue in regards to the various hold out no coiners.. and yeah, maybe even low coiners will end up fairing better than those who stubbornly stay no coiners for way longer than what is in their best interests.. and by the way, it is likely in the best interest of everyone to get into bitcoin sooner rather than later, but surely more than 90% and even maybe more than 99% (which you disagree with my number) are way too whimpy and even so far failing/refusing to get their lil selfies some cornz in case it catches on.


For sure, I like the ideas contained within my post way better, including that i had made some points that I had not previously made, but then again, I am not going to claim that anyone is going to necessarily want to really read what I wrote a bit more closely rather than just getting some superficial ideas out of some of my attempted points.

Another thing is that I would not laugh at and/or denigrate the 200-week moving average because it is quite an amazing measurement of the average weekly price for 200-weeks (4 years), even if it has been challenged in the last year and a half and surely it is not guaranteed to continue to go up, as it has so far done in bitcoin's existence on this planet and in this world.... so yeah, I am going to continue to put a decent amount of weight upon the 200-week moving average as a mostly ongoingly good bottom indicator, perhaps until it is no longer such (which is not the case, so far).


One real, and the other a short-cut with little to no proof of work (or proof of brain).

hahahahaha

Go figure. ..and also think about it.. if some posts are trying to suggest themselves as being the works of the member as author.. but yeah, sure some members are trying to give little hints, but some other members who are reading those posts might actually be mislead into believing that such member really did write such post(s).


Of course, some guys claim that their average cost per BTC are in the double or in the lower triple digits, and I am merely claiming mine to be at $1k. or maybe I could say upper triple digits if I were to start to use $999 as my average cost per BTC.. so sometimes when someone is starting to become magnitudes rather than multiples in profits, then there might not be BIG differences between being 15x up or 25x up or 40x up... and yes, the price moves up to $60k, then that becomes 60x up.. So might there be ONLY small differences between being willing to shave off a few satoshis or even a few bitcoin at the various levels of profits... even though surely many of us likely feel better if we are shaving off some satoshis while the BTC price is in an overall upward trajectory rather than being in an overall downward trajectory.


That's a point that is clear as mud.   


Fair enough.  But it sometimes can be so much fun to bring up the past... and I was largely trying to compliment you, but maybe getting caught up in a bit of patronizing and "I told you so.".. but still remember the breathing in and out thing?

 

Congrats on your giving up the alcohol.. or maybe at least presumptively cutting back to less than 1 bottle of vodka per day. 

I drink sometimes, but I get a bit nervous about drinking too much.