Re: Advertised services and participants in a paid sig campaign
As a service operator, I would hire him without hesitation because I would consider my advertising funds spent very wisely.
I believe coins.game isn't a service operator owned by you. Better you stop thinking about what coins.game CM is doing here.
Luckily, it's not your business what I'm allowed to think or what I'm allowed to write here. If you do care, why don't you reach coins.game and explain your point/argument to them and recommend your preferred CM?
You can do that yourself, I dont even know what your strange questions are trying to achieve here except from derailing the discussion because you have no valid arguments left...Explaining here makes no sense as no one from coins.game is here to hear you.
Looks like you've missed that the topic isn't intended to convince coin.game but a clarification topic regarding BenCodie's misleading poll... 
..
Just ignore him. It is clear that his opinion is conflicting with the fact that his opinion is not gospel.
1miau what you are failing to understand is that according to your perspective, I am a hypocrite.
It's really sad that you don't admit that.
But considering your past "incidents", this one is not surprising at all.
According to other people's perspective, I am maintaining my honesty and I am not changing my opinion for a signature campaign. The campaign still gets their advertising, while I make valid posts.
Don't you realize that even your own, biased poll backfired and your poll result is tied now? The people defending your hypocrisy is a small minority because for every issue, there's a strange, small minority.
If you don't like gambling, you can write walls of text against gambling but then, you should not advertise it in your Signature to get paid every week for advertising that.
That's Commonwealth sende or you opposition to gambling is not credible at all.
It's so simple!
You should stop causing trouble...
Who is causing trouble here, when he started to bring the issue to reputation because his post was exposed by me and added to the topic of CryptopreneurBrainboss? We are well allowed to point that out is it's not allowed anymore to criticize hypocrisy on the forum? You were the one taking the issue to reputation by taking things out of context with your initial poll.
And no surprise, even your own poll backfired completely because your actions are 100% hypocrisy.
You can spin that how you want, it won't change the fact that it's hypocrisy.
You'll have to live with it, that people will criticize you for that.
will this continue to be opened until someone's reputation is damaged?
Probably yes, because obviously some people here are having an issue with my topic because it's exposing their hypocrisy. But speaking of damaged reputation, I can see that Little Mouse already has one neutral DT feedback and one negative, although Lauda is not frequently in DT. Still, it seems to be an interesting case to be explored.
