the guy played for a shitty team, he doesn't have superpowers to give skills to the other players on that team, so what he did was play well as he always did, but even so it would be impossible for him alone on the field to beat the other good ones teams in that league. If Messi continued playing in Europe and in a great team it would easily be visible how he is a great player and deserves this award. When people look at Messi winning this award, they often make comparisons with Ronaldo or Haaland, but I think they shouldn't be making those comparisons. because I believe that the juries took into account the past and current context in which all these players find themselves and how they are influencing where they play and what kind of results they have brought

Messi when he arrived at PSG he visibly contributed a lot to the team, the quality of his passes and how well he can move around the field was visible. He is the type of player who, when he gets the ball, can do wonders on the field, he is not just a player who scores goals like Ronaldo and Haaland, Messi's style of play is like Ronaldinho. Both players have enormous talent on the field and were able to make their teammates receive passes well and move well on the field when these two players picked up the ball. Haaland and Ronaldo have great talent when it comes to scoring goals and I am of the opinion that this year the Ballon d'Or should have gone to Haaland and not Messi