I want to ask the users who still trust Ratimov's judgement to have a good look at
Ratimov's Trust list (do you still agree with his inclusions and exclusions?) and
Ratimov's sent feedback (is this objective and aimed at making the forum a better place?). Those users currently trust Ratimov's judgement:
Seems, I am into the game where I don't know the rules well. I added him into my trust list because he helped me two or three times to rank up and not only me, he helped other users too without asking. Then, I noticed that he is trusted by many and he also has some good threads, like
this1 and also
this2.
It's not like I trust him with everything but I think (
or thought, I need time to figure out everything) he is a better member than others, that's probably how my trust list works. Seems, I don't know the rules well.
By the way, I will be glad if someone enlightens me about the importance of trust system on this forum. I don't understand how can someone abuse it and play with it like it's a real power. Does anyone really care about the left feedback without reading proofs? If there is a negative feedback left on me without proofs, does it matter if it's left by LoyceV (don't get it wrong) or by any random newbie?
Give me some time, probably days or 1-2 weeks. I'll read more about trust system on this forum and I'll also check Ratimov's story and activity in details, then I'll make a decision. I'll also check every user that I have added in my trust list.