Chelsea started to perform well when the referee officials decided to destablize the Totenham team.
How did the referee destabilise the match? The first red card was well deserved, it was a rough tackle, which really deserves a red card. Or do you mean the second red card doesn’t also deserve it? The player was booked a yellow card initially, and he committed a yellow card offense again, which led to receiving a red card. Don’t you want the referee to give a red card even when it’s obvious that it’s a red card? I can tell you that the referee didn’t destabilise any match.
Even though Chelsea didn’t have direction, they won the match, so I will still applaud them. Most people didn’t expect Chelsea to win the match, and I am sure even without the red card, Tottenham will find it difficult to win the match, but the two red cards they received made everything so easy for Chelsea.
Chelsea is lucky although they had to win by whatever way, because the next few fixtures aren't friendly with them. They need to up their game and not rely on the controversial VAR officiating.
I know they have difficult matches ahead of them, but how did they depend on VAR in their match against Tottenham? I didn’t see any errors from VAR. The Tottenham team has to blame themselves for receiving two red cards in the match, the two red cards are worth it.