rejecting transactions for using the "isvalid" validity bypass trick is not censorship. bitcoin is made with many rules. there is reasons why someone broadcasting a [insert shitcoin] tx on the bitcoin network wont see it in the block. because there are rules to reject transaction it does not understand.(well there used to be)
And who is going to do it? One pool rejects it and another confirms it.
That's the thing about bitcoin. If you run a node, or you mine, you can reject what you want, but if someone else wants it to go through, he can.
You don't like LN, so you don't use it and don't run LN node. Someone else wants to use it, he runs LN node.
Freedom?
we have moved away from developing efficiencies and counting bytes properly where each byte should serve a useful purpose.
I bet people who pay money to send additional stuff through the blockchain think it's a good use of their resources.
Miners who are getting paid more by people who do these things don't complain either.
You're preaching to the choir here. I don't use ordinals, I don't need it, but get here a guy who does and a miner who benefits and persuade them both to stop, because you want it gone.