In your post, you're describing a false positive, and I already said before that there should be a way for users to refute the evaluation of blockchain analysis companies, or else we would merely be believing in whatever they say.
There is a very simple solution to this problem: Stop using services like Wasabi which utilize and fund blockchain analysis, and turn to one of the many much better alternatives which are not anti-privacy and pro-censorship.
If that's your solution, OK I respect that. But if you ask me, because centralized Bitcoin services will continue to be built with the use of blockchain analysis companies' services as part of their operations, then to be fair for all users, there should be a way to refute their "analysis".
I believe in the future, we'll also see mixers/tumblers start using their services too. I'm not saying there's something wrong with that because as centralized service, that's their choice. But if that's where everything is going, then we need refutability.