Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Merits 2 from 1 user
Re: Should Ratimov be in DT1?
by
LoyceV
on 10/11/2023, 13:45:45 UTC
⭐ Merited by El duderino_ (2)
This topic will not be one about Ratimov's plagiarism, although this subject will be touched
This is too ironic to not touch this subject: here, Ratimov is complaining about incorrect quotes of his "original data":
If I deleted this topic, this does not mean that anyone can now freely copy it and pass it off as their own work. You didn’t even ask me about running my own topic with my original data instead of me, you thought that you could freely dispose of this format and pass it off as your own, hiding behind some fucking link.

If I had done this and opened a similar topic, then the assholes would have been squealing on the forum, saying what a copy-pastor and thief Ratimov is, but when others do this, then there is nothing wrong with it, if he wanted to, he did it.

You present this information as if you are the author of this design and you collected this information and presented it in this way. Although in fact you didn’t do anything here, you just copied it without asking.

Here you are all playing inspectors and teaching people how to correctly format someone else’s text, although you yourself still need to be taught. If you took someone else’s finished material without permission, then it must be formatted like this:

Quote from: Ratimov's deleted thread
~

Or another option, if you wrote in the topic that all the previously collected material belongs to Ratimov, as well as the design style and presentation form, and you just decided to revive the deleted topic and continued to lead it, then I would pass by and not say anything as a reproach to you.

To verify Ratimov's plagiarism claim, I checked the unedited post, and unlike someone who would post a small link at the end of his long copied topic, NotATether started his topic by giving credit.