Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Merits 3 from 2 users
Re: Time to roll-back Ordinals?
by
digaran
on 11/11/2023, 11:44:34 UTC
⭐ Merited by pooya87 (2) ,vapourminer (1)
I don't recall any BIP which suggest to increae maximum block size by 1MB every 4 year.
Alright, then what is the plan regarding any increase of block size? Because all I read is about side/second layers and seems there is no plan for block size change at all, as if they have abandoned that notion altogether and only focused on LN, which by the way it has come to a stale state of development without any progress.

Who thought it would be a good idea to have the infrastructure in place for things like ordinals, NFTs in the first place? I mean why is there the ability to make such uses of Bitcoin's blockchain in such a wrong way, and what is the right way of using Bitcoin for anything other than transacting satoshis?

You see, when you are building a rocket to send satellites into orbit, there is no need to add unnecessary attachments just in case if in the future you'd need to send humans to the orbit, because people could attach their boats, cars etc to this rocket and enjoy a free ride.  Though we all know that we could send humans into space using rockets, WHY provide the ability now?

Is there any possible way for miners to identify ordinals and other types of garbage before adding them to their blocks? If there is then why won't they demand a much higher fee rate than ordinary transactions? That way not everyone will be able to clog the mempool like they are doing right now.

There should at least be different types of transactions, 1- ordinary tx, 2- garbage tx(ord, NFT, tokens), 3- VID(very important data, whatever that is we want to have in the future).  If that can't happen, then stop developing Bitcoin, we want competent developers.😉

What a demanding bitch I have become.😅