A lot of people change their mind about bitcoin, and I doubt that there is any real need to dig deeply into Saylor's case because sure he was negative about bitcoin in 2013, and his story is that he did not realize the use case for bitcoin until some time around and after the March 2020 events with money printing and some of the crazy monetary policy actions going on around that time. .. so if you listen to what Saylor has been saying since around August 2020 and even many points after that (believe it or not he has been in BTC for three years now), and he has given a plausible enough story as to why he considered bitcoin to be a good investment and he has built his conviction since his first investments in late 2020.. and sure some folks are a bit skeptical of him, but he seems to be mostly legitimately pushing for the ideas of bitcoin, even though he is surely much more regulation friendly and maybe some individuals consider that bitcoin needs to stay more peer to peer, and even if we have these various competing ideas in bitcoin, bitcoin is not very easy to change, so various bitcoin supporters can have different and even opposing ideas in regards to purposes of bitcoin, how it should be used and how it should be regulated (if at all?). 


Public companies have disclosure requirements, and sure for security purposes they might not disclose all of their custodians, but I am pretty sure that they have to use qualified custodians, and I am pretty sure that the topic of the custody of MSTR's coins has come up from time to time over the last 3 years, and how many specifics that they gave may be contained in their quarterly reports and I am sure that they are giving as much as they need to give legally.. but sure the questions of their adequately securing their coins could become a question of concern, even though they did seem to survive the 2022 situation in which several custodians were shown to have been irresponsible with their coins.