Here you go @Kruw
https://twitter.com/WimTweets/status/1723178230474052041This is the future that governments are longing for and slowly building. If you think that your, at first sight, government-friendly bitcoins are safe, think again. Everything in connection with privacy protocols/services is a threat to them. These are the people what Wasabi and zkSNACKs is trying to make happy by relying on blockchain analysis to point out the "bad guys". But the real bad guys wear suits and fight battles against privacy in general. Anyone who wants privacy is their enemy.
So Kruw says I should avoid Join Market and any Mixing or Tumbling service and pay Wasabi instead to work with Blockchain Analysis and tell me which of my Coins are bad so I can go through the perfectly clean Wasabi Coin Joins which will then become banned anyway. Where is the logic?
UNLESS. The speculation of Bitcoin Talk members from a while ago is in fact true. If Wasabi Coin Joins are banned anyway and Wasabi is working with some body who tells them who not to allow to pass the Great Gates of Wasabi Coin Joins, then it sounds even more fishy. This means the reality is the opposite of what Kruw has been telling us. You are NOT getting 'clean' Coins which do not even exist anyway. All they did is add a gate of Censorship.
If Wasabi Coin Joins were now 'clean'. Then their name should not have been on the Screenshot you gave us. This gives me a hint that Blockchain Analysis will only CENSOR Addresses and is NOT efficient enough to separate 'clean' from 'tainted' Addresses, what ever that even means. Why are Wasabi Coin Joins banned if there is this definition of 'clean' Coins?
-----
Kruw. Do think it is morally correct to use money coming from crime?